TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. JDM FRUIT PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED
CS(COMM)/252/2025 · 2026-03-09
Tushar Rao Gedela
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 972 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 972 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CS(COMM) 252/2025 Page 1 of 5
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 252/2025, I.A. 7386/2025, I.A. 197815/2025 I.A.
23739/2025 & I.A. 23746/2025
TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Dhruv Anand, Mr. Rohil Bansal and Mr. Chirayu Prahlad, Advocates. versus
JDM FRUIT PRODUCTS LIMITED
.....Defendant Through: Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Mr. Devanshu Khanna and Mr. Partheshwar Singh, Advocates. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R %
09.03.2026 CS(COMM) 252/2025 and I.A. 14456/2025 (For releasing/de-sealing the properties seized by the LC)
1. This is an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, on behalf of defendant seeking releasing/de-sealing of the properties seized and sealed by the Local Commissioner while execution of Commission on 25.03.2025. 2. Having regard to the discussions and deliberations qua the present application, the defendant had placed before this Court various options of the packaging material, which were stated to adequately address the infringement concerns of the plaintiffs. 3. So far as the altered packagings are concerned, the parties have agreed to two such sample packaging/trade dress which are to the satisfaction of the plaintiffs. 4. Option 1 is exhibited as Exhibit ‘A’ and re-numbered Option 2 is This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 12:54:08
CS(COMM) 252/2025 Page 2 of 5
exhibited as Exhibit ‘B’. 5. Further to the discussions between the parties the basic disputes have been resolved and the unsigned terms of settlement have been handed over to the Court today. The said terms to which the parties have agreed are as follows:-
“1. The Defendant agrees to not use their impugned packaging for their products which are given below-
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 12:54:08
CS(COMM) 252/2025 Page 3 of 5
2. That going forward, the Defendant agrees to use the below given packaging for their Juci Glucose+ (Orange and Lemon flavoured drinks) -
3. The Defendant shall destroy the goods seized by the Ld.
Local Commissioner on 25.03.2025 as listed below in the presence of the Plaintiffs representative(s)
(i) Final packaged product of Juci Glucose+:
Orange-29 Cartons (696 pieces total)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 12:54:08
CS(COMM) 252/2025 Page 4 of 5
Lemon-26 Cartons (624 pieces in total)
(ii) Approximately 400 empty Corrugated Cartons used for packing that are common to all variations of the Defendant's product (Orange and Lemon combined)
(iii)Label rolls weighing 1144Kg of such caps/covers/lids (52 rolls combined of Orange and Lemon)
(iv)Approximately 100 Cartons of empty plastic cups (1,50,000 pieces in total)
4. The Defendant agrees to suffer a decree of permanent injunction in terms of prayer clauses 114 (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of the Plaint and the Plaintiffs do not press for any cost or damages sought in the suit. 5. The cost and other expenses of the Plaintiffs' representatives shall be borne by the Plaintiffs.”
6. As per para 3 of the terms of settlement, the defendant has undertaken to destroy the goods seized by the Local Commissioner while executing the Commission on 25.03.2025 as enumerated in sub-para (i) to (iv) of the para 3, in the presence of the plaintiffs’ representative(s). 7. On account of the fact that the plaintiffs have agreed to not press any costs and damages, the defendant is willing to suffer a decree of permanent injunction in terms of the prayer clauses 114(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of the plaint. It has been agreed that the cost and other expenses of the plaintiffs’ representative and other aspects shall be borne by the plaintiffs themselves. 8. The defendant has undertaken to abide by the terms of settlement strictly. 9.
The defendant shall file a compliance affidavit within four weeks from date in respect of para 3 of the aforesaid settlement terms. 10. The parties shall remain bound by the aforesaid terms of settlement. 11. Let a decree sheet be drawn up accordingly. 12. Since, the disputes have been settled at an early stage of the Suit This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 12:54:08
CS(COMM) 252/2025 Page 5 of 5
proceedings, the plaintiffs will be entitled to refund of Court Fees in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, after completion of all the formalities as per rules. 13. The Suit is decreed and disposed of in terms thereof alongwith all pending applications. TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J MARCH 9, 2026 Sumit
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2026 at 12:54:08