JASVIR KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/9631/2025 · 2025-09-04
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97183 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97183 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 107
Jasvir Kaur and another State of Punjab
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present :- Ms. Varsha Choudhary, Advocate for
Mr. Virender Singh,
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
The petitioners namely approached this Court under Articles seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are major and are staying together in live However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A representation dated at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2 The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim th there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, A.G. and accepts notice on behalf of respondents No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-9631 Date of decision:
Jasvir Kaur and another
VERSUS and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Ms. Varsha Choudhary, Advocate for Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Jasvir Kaur and Sandeep Singh ached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the itioners are major and are staying together in live However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A representation dated 28.08.2025 (Annexure P-3 at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim th there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9631-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.09.2025
...Petitioners ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Ms. Varsha Choudhary, Advocate for Advocate, for the petitioners. Kaur and Sandeep Singh have of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the itioners are major and are staying together in live-in relationship. However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A 3) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the Superintendent of Police, Patiala. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. ...Respondents SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.04 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
107 CRWP
Lea for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of with a direction Officer, Police Station grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed the representation dated action for protection of thei circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the pol respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above Station House Officer, Police Station requisite compliance. 04.09.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
CRWP-9631-2025(O&M) Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 Officer, Police Station Sadar Thana, District Patiala grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed representation dated 28.08.2025 (Annexure P action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the
However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the pol respect thereof in accordance with law.
The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3 Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Thana requisite compliance. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No 2 rned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is to respondent No.3- Station House Sadar Thana, District Patiala to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in .08.2025 (Annexure P-3) and take appropriate r lives and liberty as may be warranted by the However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with said representation to respondent No.3- Sadar Thana, District Patiala for (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)
JUDGE Yes/No
Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.04 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document