Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010062842025 2025:GAU-AS:9850 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/682/2025 SRI MANASH PROTIM GOGOI @ MANASH GOGOI SON OF SRI AJIT GOGOI, RESIDENT OF NO.1, MAKUM PATHAR, P.O. MARGHERITA, P.S. MARGHERITA, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM,PH. NO. 8812895200 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P P BORTHAKUR, MR. T KALITA,MS IVY HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 31-07-2025 Heard Mr. P.P. Borthakur, the learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of State respondent. Page No.# 2/3 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner, who is apprehending arrest in connection with Margheria P.S. Case No. 18/2025 under Sections 308(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. Mr. Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submits that though the case was listed today for production of the Case Diary before this Court, but the I.O. has already filed Charge-Sheet in this case, vide Charge-Sheet No. 45/2025, dated 23.04.2025. 4. In this context, Mr. Borthakur, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the present petitioner is already on interim pre-arrest bail and hence his interim protection may be extended so that he can appear before the learned Trial Court seeking regular bail. 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for both sides and also considering the fact that the case has already been charge sheeted, vide Charge-Sheet No. 45/2025, dated 23.04.2025, it is provided that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Court below within 15 (fifteen) days from today and on his appearance and on his filing a petition for grant of regular bail, the learned Court below shall consider the same in accordance with law. 6. Till then, it is provided that the interim pre-arrest bail, granted to the accused/petitioner by this Court vide order dated 25.03.2025, shall remain extended for another 15 (fifteen) days from today, enabling the petitioner to appear before the learned Court below for filing fresh application for regular bail. Page No.# 3/3 7. In terms of above, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant