HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32598 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. This matter requires hearing on disputed facts. The petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. This is not a fit case for us to interfere. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal. If the petitioner approaches the Debts Recovery Tribunal within a period of three weeks from date, the Debts Recovery Tribunal is directed to hear the matter expeditiously in accordance with law. September 24, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishe Pandey, Anand Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Shikha Kaul And Another .....Petitioner(s) States Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad