Cont.P.Nos.552, 554 & 555 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Cont.P.Nos.552, 554 & 555 of 2025 M.Saravanan ...Petitioner in Cont.P.No.552 of 2025 I.Ramesh ...Petitioner in Cont.P.No.554 of 2025 V.Srinivasan ...Petitioner in Cont.P.No.555 of 2025 Vs. V.Yogananda Prabu Managing Director, Sri Venkatachalam Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd., 14, Kalarampatti Main Road, Salem – 636 015. ...Respondents in all Contempt petitions Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 28.07.2023 passed in W.P.Nos.15852 to 15854 of 2017. In all petitions: For Petitioners : Mr.K.Ramesh Sr.Counsel for M/s.V.Subramani For Respondent : Mr.S.Kalyanaraman Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.Nos.552, 554 & 555 of 2025 COMMON ORDER This Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 28.07.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.15852 to 15854 of 2017. 2. The learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner / workmen submits that this Court vide order dated 28.07.2023, issued a direction in W.P.Nos.15850 to 15855 of 2017 to the respondent / management to reinstate the workmen back into service with 35% back wages to be paid from 29.05.2010 along with continuity of service and all other attendant benefits. Though, pursuant to the order passed by this Court the petitioners in respective petitions were reinstated, however, the management has not paid the 35% backwages. Hence, the respective contempt petitions have been filed. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent that the contemnor appeared before this Court and submitted that 35% backwages have been deposited before the Labour Court and the order passed by this Court has been complied with. Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.Nos.552, 554 & 555 of 2025 4. Recording the above submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, these Contempt Petitions stand closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file a computation petition if there is any due with regard to the differential wages. 28.03.2025 rap NCC : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.Nos.552, 554 & 555 of 2025 M.DHANDAPANI, J. rap Cont.P.Nos.552, 554 & 555 of 2025 28.03.2025 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis