IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125 CWP-28391-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.03.2025 Suman Kalra ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Shashikant Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, Mr. P.P. Chahar, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, Mr. Saurabh Mago, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate, for the respondent-HSVP. ***** SURESHWAR THAKUR , J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in CWP-4769-2020. 2. Learned Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, does not dispute, the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Therefore, the instant writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the verdict rendered by this Court today in CWP-4769-2020, titled as Anil Kumar Yadav and others vs. State of Punjab and others. ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) March 20, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2025.03.27 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment