Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97159 (ALL)

MUJMILL AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/32766/2025 · 2025-10-08

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32766 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The petitioners by means of the present writ petition have prayed for the following relief:- "a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioners in the land Khasra No.1784M, 1807M, 118, 228, 232, 233, 240, 242/2, 244M, 1599/2, 1774, 1796/1, 1797 situated in Village Shekhpura Qudeem District Saharanpur pursuant to the Notification dated 16.11.1985 under Section 10(1) of the Act No. 33 of 1976 after coming in force of the Repealing Act No. 15 of 1999. b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to compel the petitioners to handover the possession of the land Khasra No.1784M, 1807M, 118, 228, 232, 233, 240, 242/2, 244M, 1599/2, 1774, 1796/1, 1797 situated in Village Shekhpura Qudeem District Saharanpur in lieu of the Notice dated 26.10.1987 under Section 10(5) of the Act No. 33 of 1976 after coming in force of the Repealing Act No. 15 of 1999. c) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to record the name of the petitioners in the relevant documents in view of the coming in force of the Act No. 15 of 1999. d) Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Guru Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mujmill And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. The petitioners have remedy of filing application before the competent authority for getting the Ceiling Case abated after promulgation of Repeal Act, 1999. 4. In such view of the fact, we dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to file an appropriate application before the competent authority to get the Ceiling Case abated. October 9, 2025 Arif WRIC No. 32766 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad