In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) And Other Connected Cases Reserved On: 03.05.2025 Pronounced On: 15.05.2025 Hardev Singh and Others ... Appellant(s) Versus State of Haryana and Another ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal. Present: Mr. Shoaib Khan, Mr. Sushik K. Sharma and Ms. Swati Sharma and Mr. Anuj Kumar Sharma, Advocates, for the landowner(s). Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate for Municipal Corporation, Panchkula. Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana and Ms. Vibha Tewari, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Anil Kshetarpal, J. 1. Brief Facts of the Case 1.1 With the consent of the learned counsel representing the parties, a batch of 163 connected cases (162 Regular First Appeals and a Civil Revision), details whereof are given at the foot of the judgment, shall stand disposed of by this common order. 1.2 Through these 162 connected regular first appeals, the correctness of the award passed by the Reference Court (hereinafter referred to as “the RC”) on 24.07.2024 is assailed. In Civil Revision No. 5761 of 2024, the Municipal Corporation, Panchkula, assails the correctness of the RC’s order passed on 15.07.2024 while dismissing its application for DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 2 And Other Connected Cases impleadment in the proceedings under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1894 Act”). 1.3 In the considered opinion of the Court, in this case, the following two issues require adjudication:- i) Whether the order passed on 15.07.2024 by the RC on 15.07.2004 dismissing the application filed by the Municipal Corporation for its impleadment in the proceedings under Section 18 of the 1894 Act is sustainable in the eyes of law? ii) Whether the Reference Court is expected to decide application for permission to lead additional evidence which was filed before the First Appellate Court after the cases were remitted back to the RC for fresh decision? 1.4 The necessary and relevant details of the acquisition are as under:- S.No. Date Particulars 1. 02.06.2006 Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1894 Act”) was published proposing to acquire the land measuring 18.14 Acres in village Saketri, Tehsil and District Panchkula, for development and utilization of residential and commercial area in Sector 2, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula. 2. 20.02.2007 Declaration under Section 6 of the 1894 Act was published. 3. 02.04.2007 The Land Acquisition Collector (hereinafter referred to as “LAC” offered to pay to the landowners @ ₹20,00,000/- per acre while acquiring the land measuring 18.14 Acres. 4. 12.04.2014 The Reference Court (hereinafter referred to as “RC”) has assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ₹1,618/- per square yard (₹78,31,120/- per acre). 5. 05.09.2022 The High Court remitted the matters back to the RC. DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 3 And Other Connected Cases S.No. Date Particulars 6. 24.07.2024 The Reference Court (hereinafter referred to as “RC”) has assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ₹1,675/- per square yard (₹81,07,000/- per acre). 1.5 In order to comprehend the issues involved in the present case, the relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed. After the issuance of preliminary notification under Section 4 and declaration under Section 6 of the 1894 Act, the land measuring 18.14 acres in village Saketri, Tehsil and District Panchkula, Haryana was acquired for the development and utilization of the residential and commercial area in Sector 2, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula, vide award No. 24 announced on 02.04.2007 by the Land Acquisition Collector. On the applications filed by the landowners under Section 18 of the 1894 Act, the RC assessed the market value @ ₹1,618/- per square yards (₹78,31,120/- per acre) which was challenged in the appeals filed by the landowners as well as the State of Haryana. During the pendency of appeals, the Municipal Corporation, Panchkula, filed the applications for impleadment which were allowed on 08.08.2022. The Government Pleader also filed an application under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) read with Section 151 CPC for permission to lead additional evidence while proposing to produce copies of as many as 18 sale deeds along with a copy of the revenue layout plan marking the location of the acquired land and the sale deeds. This Court, on 05.09.2022, remitted the matter back to the RC while observing as under:- “Needless to observe that all the objections/questions shall remain open for adjudication.” DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 4 And Other Connected Cases 1.6 After having received the file, the RC took up the matter. On 08.02.2024, the Municipal Corporation filed an application for its impleadment as respondent and for permission to file the written statement. After repeated adjournments, the landowners filed reply to the application on 08.05.2024. From the order sheet, it appears that on 12.07.2024, the arguments were heard in the application for impleadment of the Municipal Corporation and the case was adjourned to 15.07.2024 for orders on the application which was dismissed by the RC. Thereafter, on 24.07.2024, the arguments in the main case were heard and decided. 2. Analysis and Discussion 2.1 This Court is of the considered view that the matter is, once again, required to be remitted back for fresh decision. Consequently, the evidence led by the parties is not being discussed in detail. 2.2 First and foremost, the correctness of the order passed by the RC on 15.07.2024 while dismissing the application filed by the Municipal Corporation, Panchkula, for impleadment is required to be analyzed. 2.3 In the present batch of cases, the proceedings before the RC emanate from the applications filed under Section 18 of the 1894 Act by the landowners. It is significant to note that the Supreme Court in Muthavalli of Sha Madhari Diwan Wakf S.J. Syed Zakrudeen and Another v. Syed Zindasha and Others (2009) 12 SCC 280, held that the Tribunal exercises limited jurisdiction and as a result the application under Order I Rule 10 CPC is not maintainable. Similarly, in Prayag Upnivesh Awas Evam Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd. v. Allahabad Vikas Pradhikaran & Another (2003) 5 SCC 561, the Supreme Court held that the Tribunal has no DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 5 And Other Connected Cases jurisdiction to convert the proceedings under Section 18 into Section 30 of the 1894 Act. Undoubtedly, at the stage of first appeal in the previous round, the Municipal Corporation was impleaded as respondent No.4, however, the RC was correct in dismissing the application for impleadment in view of the settled law. The Municipal Corporation may, if so advised, apply to the LAC for referring the matter to the RC under Section 30 of the 1894 Act, however, in the proceedings emnating from Section 18, the Municipal Corporation cannot claim impleadment as respondent. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Municipal Corporation as well as the Civil Revision shall stand dismissed. However, the RC while deciding the reference petitions have committed the following significant errors:- I) The application filed by the State for permission to lead additional evidence vide CM-1991-CI-2022 in RFA- 4031-2015 was required to be decided by the RC particularly when the matter was remitted back for fresh decision. The State filed the application for seeking permission to produce on record the copies of 18 sale deeds which should have been allowed by the RC because the market value of the acquired land is required to be determined on the basis of the evidence adduced by the parties, and the sale exemplars play an important role in helping the Court to identify per acre price. II) As per Section 51-A of the 1894 Act, a certified copy of a document registered under the Registration Act, 1908, is admissible as evidence. In other words, formal/original DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 6 And Other Connected Cases proof of the aforesaid document is not required to be adduced. In fact, the RC appears to have totally overlooked this aspect of the matter. On 15.07.2024, the RC dismissed the application filed by the Municipal Corporation for its impleadment whereas on 24.07.2004 the final decision was passed. Moreover, the RC was factually incorrect while recording finding to the effect that no sale deeds of the contemporary period are available. The State did produce as many as 18 sale deeds in their application for permission to lead additional evidence. III) The RC has also erred in recording a finding that the acquired land does not fall in the definition of ‘shamlat land’. Such finding was neither necessary nor appropriate as the RC failed to grant an opportunity to the parties to lead evidence with respect to said question. A very limited category of the land recorded in the name of ‘shamlat patti’ comes within the definition of ‘shamlat land’ as defined in Section 2(g) of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulations) Act, 1961. As already noticed, the moment an application for impleadment by the Municipal Corporation was dismissed, the Court proceeded to pass the final award. 2.4 Consequently, the application filed for leading additional evidence is allowed and the State is permitted to produce a layout plan DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 7 And Other Connected Cases (Annexure A-19) marking the location of the acquired land and the various parcels of land which were sold through the various sale deeds and the certified copies of the various sale deeds. An opportunity is required to be given to the landowners to lead evidence in response. They are also required to be given an opportunity to prove that “whether marking of the location of the acquired land and the various parcels of plots which were the subject matter of the case, was correct or not?” 2.5 Additionally, now the Municipal Corporation, Panchkula, will have an opportunity to file applications to the LAC with a request to refer the application filed under Section 30 of the 1894 Act to the RC for adjudication. 3. Decision 3.1 Consequently, the impugned judgment passed by the RC on 24.07.2024 is set aside while directing the RC to decide the matter afresh. The appeals filed by the landowners are disposed of and the appeals filed by the Municipal Corporation, Panchkula as well as Civil Revision No. 5761 of 2024 are dismissed. 3.2 In view of the foregoing discussion, the first question is answered against the Municipal Corporation, Panchkula, because the application for impleadment as a party/respondent in the proceedings under Section 18 of the 1894 Act was not maintainable as the RC is a Court of limited jurisdiction. 3.3 With respect to the second issue, it is observed that the RC was expected to decide the application for seeking permission to lead additional evidence. Hence, the second issue is answered in affirmative. DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 8 And Other Connected Cases 3.4 The parties, through their learned counsel are directed to appear before the RC on 24.07.2025 at 10.00 A.M. 3.5 The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, in all the appeals, shall stand disposed of. (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge May 15, 2025 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Sr. No. Case No. Party’s Name 1. RFA-1077-2024 Ramzan Mohammad (Deceased) Through LRs and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 2. RFA-1078-2024 Harpal Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 3. RFA-1079-2024 Surinder Kaur Alias Suminder Kaur Vs. State of Haryana and Another 4. RFA-1080-2024 Jarnail Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 5. RFA-1082-2024 Jagir Singh (Deceased) Through LRs Vs. State of Haryana and Another 6. RFA-1084-2024 Parduman Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 7. RFA-1085-2024 Narinder Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 8. RFA-1089-2024 Parvinder Singh Alias Palvinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana 9. RFA-1091-2024 Nasib Kaur (Deceased) Through Her LRs and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 10. RFA-1094-2024 Avtar Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 11. RFA-1095-2024 Jarnail Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 12. RFA-1096-2024 Sher Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 13. RFA-1097-2024 Surjeet Kaur (Deceased) Through Her LRs Vs. State of Haryana and Another 14. RFA-1098-2024 Sarwan Singh (now Deceased) through LRs Vs. State of Haryana and Another 15. RFA-1100-2024 Gurmukh Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 16. RFA-1101-2024 Dayal Singh (now Deceased Through His LRs) and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others 17. RFA-1102-2024 Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others 18. RFA-1104-2024 Karam Singh now Deceased Through His LRs and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 19. RFA-1105-2024 Smt. Pritam Kaur now Deceased Through LRs and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others 20. RFA-1106-2024 Parvinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 21. RFA-1107-2024 Mohinder Singh (now Deceased Through His LRs) and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 22. RFA-1109-2024 Gurpreet Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 9 And Other Connected Cases Sr. No. Case No. Party’s Name 23. RFA-1110-2024 Tarsem Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 24. RFA-1112-2024 Balbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 25. RFA-1113-2024 Nirmal Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 26. RFA-1117-2024 Mohan Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 27. RFA-1118-2024 Kanta Devi Vs. State of Haryana and Another 28. RFA-1119-2024 Jarnail Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 29. RFA-1121-2024 Karam Singh (now Deceased Through His LRs) and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 30. RFA-1123-2024 Rattan Singh (now Deceased) Through LRs Vs. State of Haryana and Others 31. RFA-1124-2024 Dharam Singh ( now Deceased Through His LRs) and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 32. RFA-1126-2024 Babu Khan Through LRs Vs. State of Haryana and Others 33. RFA-1127-2024 Baljinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 34. RFA-1128-2024 Kamlesh(Deceased) Through Her LRs and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 35. RFA-1131-2024 Sawarn Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others 36. RFA-1141-2024 Harbhajan Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 37. RFA-1142-2024 Karam Chand and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 38. RFA-1143-2024 Jasbir Kaur (Deceased) Through LRs and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others 39. RFA-1147-2024 Harminder Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 40. RFA-1150-2024 Mangat Ram and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 41. RFA-1151-2024 Pritam Singh Deceased Through His LRs and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 42. RFA-1216-2024 Harjinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others 43. RFA-1221-2024 Bant Singh (now Deceased Through His LRs) and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 44. RFA-828-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Pritam Singh and Others 45. CR-5761-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Pritam Singh and Others 46. RFA-832-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Gurmukh Singh and Others 47. RFA-833-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Ajmer Singh Deceased Through LRs and Others 48. RFA-834-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Balbir Singh and Others 49. RFA-835-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Sadhu Singh Deceased Through LRs and Others 50. RFA-836-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Ramzan Mohammad and Others 51. RFA-839-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Sher Singh Deceased Through LRs and Others 52. RFA-840-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jarnail Singh and Others 53. RFA-841-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Baldev Singh and Others 54. RFA-843-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Ram Murti and Others 55. RFA-845-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Rulda Singh Deceased Through LRs and Others DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 10 And Other Connected Cases Sr. No. Case No. Party’s Name 56. RFA-846-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Babu and Others 57. RFA-847-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Abhey Ram and Others 58. RFA-848-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Angrej Kaur and Others 59. RFA-849-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Sarwan Singh and Others 60. RFA-850-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Parvinder Singh and Others 61. RFA-8497-2014 Amar Kaur and Others Vs. Rajinder Kumar and Others 62. RFA-9121-2014 Rajinder Kumar Sharma Vs. Amar Kaur & Another 63. RFA-851-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Baljinder Singh and Others 64. RFA-1161-2024 Khushal Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 65. RFA-1166-2024 Dev Raj (Deceased) Through His LRs and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 66. RFA-1181-2024 Bachan Kaur Alias Gurbachan Kaur and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 67. RFA-1188-2024 Nachhatter Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 68. RFA-1191-2024 Rulda Singh now Deceased Through His LRs Vs. State of Haryana and Another 69. RFA-1194-2024 Bhupinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others 70. RFA-1196-2024 Kuldeep Chand Alias Kuldip Chand and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 71. RFA-1197-2024 Hardev Singh (Deceased) Through His LRs. & Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Another 72. RFA-1198-2024 Trilok Singh (Deceased) Through LRs Vs. State of Haryana and Others 73. RFA-1203-2024 Dalbara Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 74. RFA-1208-2024 Kartaro Alias Kartar Kaur (now Deceased Through Her LRs) and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others 75. RFA-1209-2024 Sadhu Singh (now Deceased Through His LRs) Vs. State of Haryana and Another 76. RFA-1215-2024 Ranjit Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Another 77. RFA-1217-2024 Gurdev Singh (Deceased) Through His LRs. & Others. Vs. State of Haryana and Another 78. RFA-1223-2024 Balbir Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others 79. RFA-1224-2024 Shashi Bala and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Another 80. RFA-1227-2024 Sucha Singh Through His Lr Vs. State of Haryana and Another 81. RFA-852-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Baldev Singh and Others 82. RFA-853-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Mewa Singh and Others 83. RFA-854-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Bhupinder Singh and Others 84. RFA-855-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Surjeet Kaur Deceased Through LRs and Others 85. RFA-856-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Nand Singh and Others 86. RFA-857-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Achhru Ram Deceased Through LRs and Others 87. RFA-858-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Shamsher Singh and DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 11 And Other Connected Cases Sr. No. Case No. Party’s Name Others 88. RFA-859-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Karam Chand and Others 89. RFA-863-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Gurmeet Singh and Others 90. RFA-864-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jatinder Kaur @ Balbir Kaur and Others 91. RFA-865-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Harpal Singh and Others 92. RFA-866-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Harminder Singh and Others 93. RFA-867-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Nasib Kaur and Others 94. RFA-868-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Sarwan Singh and Others 95. RFA-869-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Pritam Kaur Deceased Through LRs and Others 96. RFA-870-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Rajinder Singh and Others 97. RFA-871-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Bant Singh and Others 98. RFA-872-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Karnail Singh and Others 99. RFA-873-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Gurdev Singh and Others 100. RFA-874-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Tarsem Singh and Others 101. RFA-875-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Mohinder Singh Deceased Through LRs and Others 102. RFA-876-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Ashwani Kumar and Others 103. RFA-877-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Babu Khan Deceased Through LRs And Others 104. RFA-878-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Harmel Singh and Others 105. RFA-879-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Nachhattar Singh and Others 106. RFA-880-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Kamlesh and Others 107. RFA-881-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jit Singh and Others 108. RFA-882-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Vasdev and Others 109. RFA-883-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Pritam Singh Deceased Through LRs and Others 110. RFA-884-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Dharam Singh Deceased Through LRs and Others 111. RFA-885-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Rattan Singh Deceased Through LRs and Others 112. RFA-886-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Harminder Singh and Others 113. RFA-887-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Dev Raj and Others 114. RFA-888-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Hardev Singh and Others 115. RFA-889-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Mohan Singh and Others 116. RFA-890-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Bachan Kaur and Others 117. RFA-891-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Shashi Bala and Others 118. RFA-892-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Narinder Singh and Others 119. RFA-893-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jarnail Singh and Others DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 12 And Other Connected Cases Sr. No. Case No. Party’s Name 120. RFA-894-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jai Kishan and Others 121. RFA-895-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jagir Singh (Deceased) through LRs and Others 122. RFA-896-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Pal Singh and Others 123. RFA-897-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Avtar Singh and Others 124. RFA-898-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jaspal Singh and Others 125. RFA-899-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Nirmal Singh and Others 126. RFA-900-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Tarlochan Singh and Others 127. RFA-901-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Parduman Singh and Others 128. RFA-902-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Kuldeep Chand and Others 129. RFA-903-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Mangat and Others 130. RFA-904-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Karam Singh and Others 131. RFA-905-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Gurbax Singh and Others 132. RFA-906-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jaspal Singh and Others 133. RFA-907-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Mangat Ram and Others 134. RFA-908-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Mohan Singh and Others 135. RFA-909-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Parvinder Singh Alias Palvinder Singh and Others 136. RFA-910-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jarnail Singh and Others 137. RFA-911-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Gurpreet Singh and Others 138. RFA-912-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Nirmal Singh and Others 139. RFA-913-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jang Singh and Others 140. RFA-914-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Kanta Devi and Others 141. RFA-915-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Balbir Singh and Others 142. RFA-916-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Kartar Singh and Others 143. RFA-917-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Jaggan Nath and Others 144. RFA-918-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Khushal Singh and Others 145. RFA-919-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Karam Singh and Others 146. RFA-920-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Harbhajan Singh and Others 147. RFA-921-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Ranjit Singh and Others 148. RFA-922-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Pritpal Singh and Others 149. RFA-923-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Dhian Singh and Others 150. RFA-924-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Surinder Kaur Alias Suminder Kaur and Others 151. RFA-925-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Kulwant Singh and Others 152. RFA-926-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Usha Rani and Others 153. RFA-927-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Matu and Others 154. RFA-928-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Sita Deceased Through LRs and Others DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Regular First Appeal No. 1075 of 2024 (O&M) 13 And Other Connected Cases Sr. No. Case No. Party’s Name 155. RFA-929-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Bhupinder Singh and Others 156. RFA-930-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Hardev Singh and Others 157. RFA-931-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Ravi Nandan and Others 158. RFA-932-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Bachni Devi Deceased Through LRs and Others 159. RFA-933-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Labh Singh and Others 160. RFA-965-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Dilbara Singh and Others 161. RFA-966-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Sucha Singh and Others 162. RFA-968-2024 Municipal Corporation Panchkula Vs. Pritam Singh and Others (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge May 15, 2025 “DK” DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.05.26 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document