Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9713 (UTT)

ANKUSH SINGH DANU v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1372/2025 · 2025-08-06

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6956 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No.1372 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Suresh Chandra Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned AAG along with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant–Ankush Singh Danu S/o Netra Singh Danu is seeking regular bail in relation to first information report dated 14.07.2025 bearing FIR No.0013 of 2025, Police Station Ranikhet, District Almora, wherein the present applicant along with one Mukesh Singh have been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 8/20 read with Section 60 of the NDPS Act, 1985. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and the alleged contraband (Charas), which is shown to be recovered from the present applicant, is 725 grams, which is below commercial quantity, and, furthermore, there is no proper substantial compliance of Section 50 of the NDPS Act and also there is no independent witness. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant also submits that the present applicant is having no previous criminal history. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the present applicant is a student pursing Diploma in Government Polytechnic College, Dwarahat. 7. On the other side, Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned AGA for the State has not disputed this fact that the alleged contraband, which is shown to be recovered from the present applicant, is below 2025:UHC:6956 commercial quantity and the applicant is having no previous criminal history. 8. After hearing the arguments as advanced by learned counsel for the applicant and further taking into consideration that the alleged contraband, which is shown to be recovered from the present applicant, is below commercial quantity and the applicant is having no previous criminal history, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserve for bail. 9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant, namely, Ankush Singh Danu, be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 06.08.2025 R.Bisht 2025:UHC:6956