Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97129 (PNJ)

JASHANPREET KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHRS

CRM-M/48759/2025 · 2025-09-02

Kirti Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-48759-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (110) CRM-M-48759-2025 Date of decision: September 02, 2025 JASHANPREET KAUR ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner. **** KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the issuance of a direction upon the official respondents to transfer investigation of FIR No.62, dated 16.04.2025, under Sections 126(2), 78, 74, 351(2), 134 and 3(5) of BNS, registered at Police Station Nangal, District Rupnagar to any other independent agency or to any other Senior Officer of Police. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed the representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) before respondent No.3 raising her grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereupon. He further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if, appropriate directions are issued to the respondents concerned to consider and decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action thereupon. 3. Notice of motion to the official respondents at this stage only. ITHLESH KUMAR 2025.09.03 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CRM-M-48759-2025 -2- 4. At the asking of the Court, Ms. Guramrit Kaur, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paper-book be supplied to her during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner expeditiously and within a time bound manner, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE September 02, 2025 Ithlesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ITHLESH KUMAR 2025.09.03 15:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment