PARVEEN KUMAR ALIAS BINNU ALIAS VEENU v. STATE OF HARYANA
CRM-M/51821/2024 · 2025-05-14
Sanjiv Berry
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97108 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97108 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
246-1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-51821-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.05.2025
PARVEEN KUMAR ALIAS BINNU ALIAS VEENU ….Petitioner
Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. G.S. Ghuman, Advocate for Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana. ..… SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition at this stage with liberty to file the same afresh with better particulars in accordance with law.
2.
Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with aforesaid liberty.
3. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SANJIV BERRY) 14.05.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.05.15 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment