Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97108 (MAD)

A.DURAISAMY v. A.THIRUMOORTHY

CMP/21984/2025 · 2025-09-08

A D Maria Clete

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P. Nos. 21984, 21990 & 21991 of 2025 in S.A. No. 747 of 2014 DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 29 days in filing the application to set aside the abatement of R3, to set aside the abatement of R3 and to bring on record the legal heirs of R3. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. It is seen from the affidavit filed in support of these petitions that the death of R3 was informed belatedly and hence, the delay occurred, is neither wilful nor wanton. 3.Mr. P. Shri Santhaaji, Learned counsel who held vakalat for R3 submits that he has got no serious objection in allowing these petitions and undertakes to file vakalat for the proposed respondents. 4.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title and print the name of the said counsel for the newly impleaded respondents on receipt of the vakalat. 08.09.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ay https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis