HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32647 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. This writ petition is misconceived as the same has been filed against a private finance company. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Finance Company, being the respondent Nos.2 and 3, submits that the petitioner has failed to make payment of his dues. 3. In light of the above, we are of the view that this is not a fit case for us to interfere. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Bank for redressal of his grievance. September 24, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Kumar, Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Arvind Prabodh Dubey (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Danish Mukhtar .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad