Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97093 (ALL)

SUSHILA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NA528/35852/2025 · 2025-09-16

Dinesh Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35852 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State respondents. 2. . The applicant has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 B.N.S.S. for concluding the entire criminal proceedings of Case No. 32/2009-2010 computerized Case No. T2010143604280 (Mahendra Pratap versus Vidhya Devi) under Section 145 Cr.P.C., Police Station-Sikrara, District- Jaunpur pending before the court of Additional Sub Divisional Magistrate-IInd, Division-Varanasi, Tehsil-Sadar, District- Jaunpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant is recorded tenure holder of the property in question, However, intending to harass her, the proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. has been initiated, despite the fact that he is in possession over there. He next submits that police has submitted report on 24.01.2010 and based on the said report, learned S.D.M. has passed preliminary order dated 19.05.2010 under Section 145 (1) Cr.P.C. and at present, the case is matured for final disposal. However, due to non cooperating attitude of the other side, proceedings is protracted which encompasses prejudice to the present applicant. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the submissions advanced Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepak Kumar Vishwakarma, Vishwanath Vishwakarma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sushila Devi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) by the learned counsel for the applicant. 5. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep the instant application pending, therefore, the same is being decided finally without entering into the merits of the case with a direction that the aforementioned case be concluded in accordance with law, expeditiously as early as possible. 6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, instant application is finally disposed of. September 17, 2025 SY NA528 No. 35852 of 2025 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad