130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26067-2025 Date of decision: 03.09.2025 Ashish ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Parveen, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Additional A.G., Haryana. Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.2-HPSC. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 30.07.2025 (Annexure P-9) submitted by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-9) of the petitioner is decided by respondent No.2 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that they has no objection in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2 for time-bound consideration and decision of the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order. Neha 2025.09.03 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-26067-2025 -2- 4. Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation (Annexure P-9) of the petitioner and pass a speaking order, after affording him an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.2. 5. Disposed of, accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 03.09.2025 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Neha 2025.09.03 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document