Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3178 CRL.P No. 200320 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.200320 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
MOHAMMED QADEER S/O MOHAMMED MASTAN SAB, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O H. NO.7-920/1A, MIJGORI ROAD, NEAR KIRANA MERCHANT, NAYA MOHELLA, KALABURAGI-585 102.
2.
MOHAMMED ABDUL HAMEED S/O ABDUL KAREEM SHAIKH, AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: SOCIAL WORKER, R/O H.NO.1-949/62/31/B, AL KAREEM VILLAH, OLD JEWERGI ROAD, NEAR HUDA MASJID, REHMATHNAGAR COLONY, VTC KALABURAGI-585 102.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SYED FAYAZUDDIN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH UNIVESITY P.S. KALABURAGI, REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI-585 103.
2.
MOHAMMED ISMAIL FAISAL S/O MOHAMMED ALI, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULUTRE,
Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3178 CRL.P No. 200320 of 2025
R/O H.NO.4-601/67B /3, NEAR MACCA MASJID, BANDA NAWAZ COLONY, KALABURAGI-585 104.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. NANDKISHORE BOOB, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C.(OLD), U/S 528 OF BNSS (NEW), PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH THE FIR IN CR. NO. 39/2025 FIR NO. 393/2025 PENDING FOR DISPOSAL BEFORE THE III ADDL.
JMFC AT KALABURAGI FOR THE OFFENCES U/SEC. 352, 351(1), 351(2), 126(2) OF BNSS, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS OF UNIVERSITY PS KALABURAGI TO PASS ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDERS AS MAY BE DEEMED NECESSARY IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)
After addressing the arguments at length, learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo, which reads as under:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3178 CRL.P No. 200320 of 2025
“In the above case the petitioners are not pressing the matter and praying for the liberty to file the similar petition after filing the charge sheet. Hence the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to file the same after charge sheet in the interest of justice.”
2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39 CT: AK