Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9706 (RAJ)

SUVITA MEENA WIFE OF SHRI RAJESH KUMAR MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3375/2025 · 2025-03-11

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11019] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3375/2025 Suvita Meena Wife Of Shri Rajesh Kumar Meena, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Village Bhodki, Tehsil Guda Gourji, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Secretariat,rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj. Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Director (Non-Gazetted)-Cum- Additional Director (Administration), Panchyati Raj (Medical And Health Services), Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Block Chief Medical Officer, Khetri, (Jhunjhunu). 5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu. 6. Pinki Yadav, Anm, Shc Sardarsahar, Block Sankda, District Jaisalmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 11/03/2025 Upon perusal of the impugned order dated 11.02.2025 passed by Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal Jaipur, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Howsoever, petitioner are at liberty to file detailed representation stating grievances qua transfer/transfer policy, before the [2025:RJ-JP:11019] (2 of 2) [CW-3375/2025] competent authority, within a period of seven days from the date of passing of this order. This Court further directs respondent/competent authority to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed within 7 days, within a period of 15 days thereafter, strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned direction. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/155