HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3778 of 2025 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. Heard Shri Anil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. A vague application has been made to the Consolidation Commissioner. The petitioner has failed to establish his locus standi. It is not clear whether he is aggrieved by any order passed by the Consolidation Commissioner or as to how he is a person aggrieved. The petitioner has not disclosed whether he has taken out any proceedings under the UP Consolidation of Holdings Act or as to how he is aggrieved in the matter. The Consolidation Act is a complete code and appropriate remedies are available to the petitioner under the Consolidation Act. The said remedies clearly have not been invoked by the petitioner. In wake of the aforesaid the writ petition is dismissed. September 17, 2025 Dhananjai Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Pankaj Tomar .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad