Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97044 (ALL)

DR. KUNWAR MRITYUNJAY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/13951/2025 · 2025-09-16

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13951 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:- " 1. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to transfer the petitioner to any of the offices/institutions, under the Department of Technical Education (Diploma Sector), situated in the metro cities, so that the petitioner may have access to advanced medical facilities and be able to reach Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, at the earliest in case of any emergency or other medical requirement; 2. Issue a writ, order, rules or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation of petitioner dated 03.06.2025 (Annexures-'11'), pending before them, and let him continue on the current place of posting, i.e. at Institute of Research, Development & Training (IRDT), Kanpur, so that the petitioner may have access to advanced medical facilities and be able to reach Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, at the earliest, in case of any emergency or other medical requirement, within a stipulated period as fix by this Hon'ble Court. " 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.1 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri D. K. Verma, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri D. K. Verma, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanu Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dr. Kunwar Mrityunjay Singh .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned standing counsel. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.1 Additional Chief Secretary (Technical Education), Government of U.P., Lucknow within one week. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.1 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 17, 2025 AKT WRIA No. 13951 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad