IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 239/2 SANDEEP SINGH ALIAS SONI STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: RAMESH KUMARI case FIR No.77 dated 17.09.2020, 307/506/148/149 IPC Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act, District Moga. 2. has been falsely implicated in the present case IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SANDEEP SINGH ALIAS SONI VS. STATE OF PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Mr. Kulwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Baljinder Singh Sran, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** RAMESH KUMARI, J.(ORAL) This is a petition for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.77 dated 17.09.2020, 506/148/149 IPC (Offence under Section 473 IPC added lateron) and 25 and 27 of Arms Act, registered District Moga. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-48995 of 2025 Date of decision: 09.09.2025 ..PETITIONER ..RESPONDENT RAMESH KUMARI , Advocate Addl. AG, Punjab. This is a petition for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.77 dated 17.09.2020, registered under Sections (Offence under Section 473 IPC added lateron) and registered at Police Station Badhni Kalan Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that earlier the This is a petition for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in s (Offence under Section 473 IPC added lateron) and Badhni Kalan Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner POONAM SHARMA 2025.09.11 11:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-48995 of 2025 petitioner was granted regular bail by 26.02.2021. hearing, however, he could not appear on 12.08.2024 due to ill health of her mother-in-law, which resulted in cancellation of his bail bonds and surety bonds. It is further submitted that subsequently proclaimed offender on 17.02.2025. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2025 and conclusion of trial will take sufficient time, therefore, the petitioner is admitted to bail. 3. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the to the petitioner on the ground that there are serious allegations been leveled against the petitioner. 4. 5. 21.02.2025, t conclusion of trial will take sufficient time, as such, the present petition deserves to be allowed. Therefore, the merits of the case, the pe ordered to be released on regular bail during pendency of the trial, on furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. 48995 of 2025 petitioner was granted regular bail by The petitioner attended each and every subsequent date of hearing, however, he could not appear on 12.08.2024 due to ill health of her aw, which resulted in cancellation of his bail bonds and surety bonds. It is further submitted that subsequently offender on 17.02.2025. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2025 and conclusion of trial will take sufficient time, therefore, the petitioner is admitted to bail. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the to the petitioner on the ground that there are serious allegations leveled against the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the In view of the facts that the petitioner is in custod 21.02.2025, the material witnesses have been examined and conclusion of trial will take sufficient time, as such, the present petition to be allowed. Therefore, at this stage the merits of the case, the petitioner namely ordered to be released on regular bail during pendency of the trial, on furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. -2- petitioner was granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated The petitioner attended each and every subsequent date of hearing, however, he could not appear on 12.08.2024 due to ill health of her aw, which resulted in cancellation of his bail bonds and surety bonds. It is further submitted that subsequently the petitioner was declared offender on 17.02.2025. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2025 and conclusion of trial will take sufficient time, Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the grant of regular bail to the petitioner on the ground that there are serious allegations that have I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the facts that the petitioner is in custody since he material witnesses have been examined and that the conclusion of trial will take sufficient time, as such, the present petition at this stage without commenting upon namely Sandeep Singh alias Soni is ordered to be released on regular bail during pendency of the trial, on furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Illaqa vide order dated The petitioner attended each and every subsequent date of hearing, however, he could not appear on 12.08.2024 due to ill health of her aw, which resulted in cancellation of his bail bonds and surety the petitioner was declared offender on 17.02.2025. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2025 and conclusion of trial will take sufficient time, grant of regular bail that have since that the conclusion of trial will take sufficient time, as such, the present petition without commenting upon is ordered to be released on regular bail during pendency of the trial, on furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Illaqa POONAM SHARMA 2025.09.11 11:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-48995 of 2025 expression of an opinion by this Court on merits of the case. The learned Court below is directed to proceed with the matter on its own merits, lest it may prejudice the trial. September 09, 2025 Poonam Sharma 48995 of 2025 Nothing observed hereinabove shall be construed to be expression of an opinion by this Court on merits of the case. The learned Court below is directed to proceed with the matter on its own merits, lest it may prejudice the trial. r 09, 2025 Poonam Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No -3- Nothing observed hereinabove shall be construed to be expression of an opinion by this Court on merits of the case. The learned Court below is directed to proceed with the matter on its own merits, lest it (RAMESH KUMARI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Nothing observed hereinabove shall be construed to be expression of an opinion by this Court on merits of the case. The learned Court below is directed to proceed with the matter on its own merits, lest it POONAM SHARMA 2025.09.11 11:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document