SURAJ KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/21012/2025 · 2025-09-16
Rajiv Gupta, Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97028 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97028 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21012 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed that in the instant case, during the course of investigation, certain other sections has been added.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid fact and has stated that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh writ petition with better particulars.
3. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
4. Certified copy of the documents be returned to learned counsel for the petitioners as per Rules. September 17, 2025 Kushal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madan Ji Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Suraj Kumar Pandey And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad