Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41034 of 2024 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. A preliminary objection has been raised by Shri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ram Krishna Koli, learned counsel for opposite party Nos.2 to 4 that the Application U/s 482 itself is not maintainable as there is an availability of effective alternative remedy in the form of revision. The order against which the present proceedings has been instituted is an order dismissing the complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C. IPC, which is revisable.
2. On such objection being raised by the Learned counsel for opposite party Nos.2 to 4, Shri Shashi Ranjan Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this application and file a revision.
3. The prayer made is granted.
4. The Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to approach the Revisional Court. October 8, 2025 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhirendra Bahadur Singh, Hriday Narayan Pandey, Ram Sunder Yadav, Shashi Ranjan Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ram Krishna Koli (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Ramesh Chand .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad