Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9702 (CHH)

SMT. RATNI BAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1653/2021 · 2025-04-15

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17142 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1653 of 2021 1 Smt. Ratni Bai W/o Shri Ramkhilawan Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kharod, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 Collector Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 3 Chief Medical And Health Officer Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 4 Block Medical Officer Baloda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 5 Ramkhilawan Adiya S/o Ram Sai Aditya Working As Dresser, At Govt. Hospital Balouda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh R/o Village JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.04.16 10:30:56 +0530 2 Balouda, Tahsil And P. S. Balouda Govt. Hospital Campus, Balouda District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Saumitra Kesharwani, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 15.04.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, who is clamming herself as wife of respondent No. 5 is seeking limited direction to the respondents to decide the representation i.e. Annexure P-1, dated 30.10.2018 submitted before Respondent no. 3 by which the petitioner is seeking action against respondent No. 5 levelling several allegation against him. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation dated 30.10.2018 (Annexure P-1) has not been decided till date. 3. Learned State counsel submits that if the representation is still pending before respondent No. 3, the same will be considered and decided within stipulated period, in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed. 3 5. In view of the submission made by the learned State counsel, at this juncture, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No. 3 to decide the representation (Annexure P-1). 6. Petitioner is directed to apprise the concerned authority (respondent No. 3) about the order of this court within a period of 20 days from today. 7. In case the petitioner apprise respondent No. 3 within the aforesaid period, the respondent No. 3 looking to the grievance of the petitioner shall pass reasoned and speaking orders, in accordance with law by providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to all the affected parties within a further period of 50 days. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Jyoti