226-8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-28962-2024 Date of Decision: 03.09.2025 Vinod Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Baljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, thus, instant petition has rendered infructuous. 2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 03.09.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.03 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document