Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97014 (ALL)

VIRENDRA KUMAR PUSHKAR v. SHRIMATI SANU SINGH AND ANOTHER

A227/11092/2025 · 2025-09-16

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11092 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "यह िक सम्माननीय न्यायालय से न्यायिहत में सादर प्राथर्ना है वाद संख्या-715/2023 (वीरेन्द्र कु मार पुष्कर बनाम सानू िसह आिद) अंतगर्त धारा-13 (1) िहन्दू िववाह अिधिनयम- 1995 जो प्रधान न्यायाधीश, पिरवार न्यायालय, इटावा के न्यायालय में वषर् 2023 से लिम्बत है, के िनस्तारण एवं डे-टू-डे सुनवाई के िलए िनम्न न्यायालय को दो माह में िनस्तारण हेतु उिचत / न्यायोिचत आदेश पािरत करने की महती कृ पा करें।" 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the proceedings under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act are pending since 2023. It has been further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that appropriate directions be issued to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Etawah seized with the proceedings of divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act to decide the same within a stipulated time or in a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner brought attention of the Court to the provision of Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act which contemplates to conclude the trial within six months from the date of service of notice of petition on the respondents. 5. Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act is quoted as under: Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Vishwakarma, Anil Kumar Singh, Ranjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Virendra Kumar Pushkar .....Petitioner(s) Shrimati Sanu Singh And Another .....Respondent(s) "21-B. Special provision relating to trial and disposal of petitions under the Act.-(1) The trial of a petition under this Act shall, so far as is practicable consistently with the interest of justice in respect of the trial, be continued from day to day until its conclusion unless the Court finds the adjournment of the trial beyond the following day to be necessary for reasons to be recorded. (2) Every petition under this Act shall be tried as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of service of notice of the petition on the respondent. (3) Every appeal under this Act shall be tried as expeditiously as possible, and endeavour shall be made to conclude the hearing within three months from the date of service of notice of appeal on the respondent." 6. In view of the statutory requirement as contemplated under Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 7. The Principal Judge, Family Court, Etawah is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid pending proceeding before him, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned as well as opportunity to lead evidence in support of their case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment, keeping in view the statutory mandate of Section 21-B of the Hindu Marriage Act quoted above. 8. With these observation, this petition is disposed of. September 17, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11092 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad