APHC010107242013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10391/2013 Between: B. Kiran Kumar Reddy, ...PETITIONER AND The A P Genco Rep By Its M D and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P S P SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V SESHA KUMARI 2. The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10391 of 2013 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “… to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in calling only 4088 candidates instead of 5265 candidates @ 1:3 for the purpose of attending TRADE TEST and not issuing Hall Ticket to the Petitioner for TRADE TEST to be conducted on 13.04.2013 for the post of Junior Plant Attendants in pursuance to Notification dated 05.01.2011 read with addendum dated 29.01.2011 and supplemental notification dated 17.10.2011 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and the same is violative of Recruitment notification and consequently direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to attend the TRADE TEST scheduled on 13.04.2013 by including his name in the list of 1:3 candidates and pass.…” 2. This court, on 04.04.2013, while issuing Rule nisi, call for records, passed the following interim order: “The petitioner shall be subjected to trade test, subject to production of the original qualification certificates, community certificate, online application and if he falls within the ratio of 1:3, after deleting the 429 candidates + 97 candidates whose candidature is under cloud as of now. His result shall also be published, without any reference to the pendency of the writ petition. It is always open to the respondents to call for a detailed verification of the certificates and qualifications of the petitioner”. 3 3. Respondents filed counter stating that even if the next 429 candidates are not called, 1:3 ratio is fulfilled and is in excess. However, in the light of the directions granted by this Court, the petitioner was permitted to Trade Test, but was not taken into account for the selection process, as he was not covered under the ratio 1:3 and the excess notified by the department. 4. In view of the said submissions made by the respondents, nothing survives in this writ petition as the petitioner would not come under the purview of the selection process and the same is dismissed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 17.04.2025 SJ 4 95 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10391 of 2013 Date : 17.04.2025 SJ