Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96997 (PNJ)

HARJINDER SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/24570/2023 · 2025-05-28

Deepinder Singh Nalwa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-24570 of 2023 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 246/10 CWP-24570 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:28.05.2025 Harjinder Singh ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA **** Present: Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate, for the respondent-FCI. Mr. Anil Gupta, Advocate, for Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. Naveen Chopra, Advocate, for respondent No.4-ICAR. **** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA , J. (Oral) 1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner is praying for quashing of the impunged orders dated 25.06.2019 (Annexure P-1), 25.06.2019 (Annexure P-2), 11.10.2021 (Annexure P-3), 22.10.2021 (Annexure P-4), 26.10.2021 (Annexure P-4A), 30.11.2021 (Annexure P-5) and 25.09.2019 (Annexure P-6) issued by respondent No.3 whereby, a fact finding enquiry for ascertaining the role of the petitioner has been ordered. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is duly covered by the judgment passed DINESH 2025.06.05 08:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24570 of 2023 (O&M) 2 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case titled as Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Field Employees Union versus Union of India and others , CWP No.27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided on 14.05.2025. However, he submits that a perusal of the aforesaid order would reflect that the liberty has been granted to the petitioners therein, to submit the representation, which will be considered by the concerned authority in terms of the order passed by the Court. He further submits that the present petition may be treated as a representation and the respondents be directed to consider the same in light of the order passed in CWP No.27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided on 14.05.2025. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in CWP-27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided on 14.05.2025. 4. The respondents are directed to treat the present writ petition as a representation and take a decision in terms of the judgment passed by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided on 14.05.2025 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE May 28, 2025 dinesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH 2025.06.05 08:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document