- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2450 WP No. 201090 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.201090 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. KRISHNAREDDY S/O RAMESHREDDY AGE: 34 YEARS OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: KAILASH NAGAR, KALABURAGI. 2. SRIKANTREDDY S/O RAMESHREDDY AGE: 34 YEARS OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: KAILASH NAGAR, KALABURAGI. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI.MAHANTESH H. DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE KALABURAGI CITY, KALABURAGI. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE KALABURAGI CITY, KALABURAGI. 3. THE POLICE INSPECTOR CHOWK POLICE STATION, KALABURAGI. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2450 WP No. 201090 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED IN ORDER NO.88/ROWDY SHEET/SDPO/B/K/20/7, DATED:16.02.2017 BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) No representation on petitioners’ side on call. 2. As per the material available on record, the writ petition was filed on 16.03.2024. Office raised certain objections. The petitioners did not choose to comply those objections. Therefore, the writ petition stood dismissed by order dated 28.08.2024. Thereafter, the petitioners filed I.A.No.1/2024 to recall the order dated 28.08.2024. I.A.No.1/2025 is filed to condone the delay of 164 days in filing I.A.No.1/2024. Both the applications were allowed by order dated 19.03.2025. The Court again granted a week’s time to comply the office objections. However, as per - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2450 WP No. 201090 of 2024 office note, office objections are not complied yet. Also there is no representation on petitioners’ side. All these facts clearly reveal gross negligence on the part of the petitioners in pursuing the matter. This Court does not find any ground to keep the writ petition pending. 3. Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (Dr.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VNR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6 CT:NI