Page No. 1/5 GAHC010062222025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/950/2025 DIPTI MEDHI WIFE OF LATE DHARMA RAM MEDHI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MIKIRGAON, P.O. AND P.S. - SONAPUR, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), PIN- 782402, ASSAM VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED HEREIN BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OFASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPAFTMENT, ADDRESS- I BLOCK, 2ND FLOOR, ASSAM SECRETARIAT (CIVIL), DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781006, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) HENGRABARI GUWAHATI PIN- 781036 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER SONAPUR REVENUE CIRCLE SONAPUR BAZAR ROAD REWA NC PIN-782401 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 4:APURBA KUMAR MEDHI S/O LATE KARUNA KANTA MEDHI R/O VILL- KAMALAZARI P.O. AND P.S.- SONAPUR MOUZA- DIMORIA DIST- KAMRUP (M) PIN-782402 ASSAM Page No. 2/5 5:AMIYA KUMAR MEDHI S/O LATE KARUNA KANTA MEDHI R/O VILL- KAMALAZARI P.O. AND P.S.- SONAPUR MOUZA- DIMORIA DIST- KAMRUP (M) PIN-782402 ASSAM 6:RAJIB KUMAR MEDHI S/O LATE KARUNA KANTA MEDHI R/O VILL- KAMALAZARI P.O. AND P.S.- SONAPUR MOUZA- DIMORIA DIST- KAMRUP (M) PIN-782402 ASSAM 7:BHABANI MOHAN MEDHI S/O LATE KARUNA KANTA MEDHI R/O VILL- KAMALAZARI P.O. AND P.S.- SONAPUR MOUZA- DIMORIA DIST- KAMRUP (M) PIN-782402 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHAMARIA, MR A N SARMAH,MR M M ZAMAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM Linked Case : WP(C)/6891/2024 DIPTI MEDHI W/O- LATE DHARMA RAM MEDHI R/O- VILLAGE- MIKIRGAON P.O AND P.S- SONAPUR DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M) Page No. 3/5 ASSAM. 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) HENGRABARI GUWAHATI PIN- 781036 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER SONAPUR REVENUE CIRCLE SONAPUR BAZAR ROAD REWA NC PIN-782401 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM Advocate for : MR. S CHAMARIA Advocate for : SC REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPT appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 05.04.2025 Heard Mr. M.M. Zaman, learned counsel for the applicant; Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department for the opposite party- respondent no. 1; and Ms. S. Baruah, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party-respondent nos. 2 & 3. 2. The instant interlocutory application is filed by the applicant seeking impleadment of the following persons :- [4] Apurba Kumar Medhi, [5] Amiya Kumar Medhi, [6] Rajib Kumar Medhi, Page No. 4/5 [7] Bhabani Mohan Medhi, All are sons of Late Karuna Kanta Medhi, resident of Village – Kamalazari, P.O. & Mouza – Dimoria, District – Kamrup [Metro], Pin- 782402, Assam. as party-respondent no. 4 to party-respondent no. 7 respectively in the connected writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 6891/2024. 3. The applicant as the writ petitioner has preferred the connected writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 6891/2024 assailing an Order dated 12.12.2024 passed by the opposite party-respondent no. 3 and also for a direction to the opposite party-respondent nos. 2 & 3 to issue Land Sale Permission to the applicant-petitioner. 4. It is stated in the application that the impugned Order dated 12.12.2024 has been passed by the opposite party-respondent no. 3 in view of a pending litigation between the applicant-writ petitioner and the proposed party-respondents and in such view of the matter, their presence in the connected writ petition is necessary. 5. The prayer for impleadment is not opposed by the learned counsel for the Official respondents. 6. I have gone through the statements and averments made in the application seeking impleadment of the afore-mentioned persons as party-respondents in the connected writ petition. Having gone through the statements and averments made in this writ petition, this Court is of the considered view that presence of the afore-mentioned persons as party-respondents in the connected writ petition is necessary for proper and effective adjudication of the issues involved in the connected writ petition. Accordingly, the instant interlocutory application is allowed. 7. The applicant-writ petitioner shall file an amended cause-title in terms of the Notification no. 79 dated 19.06.2023 within 3 [three] working days from today and on filing of such amended cause-title, the Registry shall carry out the necessary corrections in the cause-title of the connected writ petition as well as in the CIS and list the writ petition for admission immediately Page No. 5/5 thereafter, for issuance of notice to the newly impleadment party- respondents. JUDGE Comparing Assistant