MAMRAJ SHARMA S/O BABULAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3190/2025 · 2025-06-12
Anand Sharma V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9695 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9695 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23121] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3190/2025 Mamraj Sharma S/o Babulal Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Swamiyon Ki Dhani, Lakher, Police Station Chandwaji, Jaipur. (At Present Confined To Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Tantia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy. G.A. with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)
Order 12/06/2025
1. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner in respect of F.I.R. No.77/2024 registered at Police Station Murlipura District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B of IPC, 1860.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the offences alleged against him in the FIR are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in the instant matter, whereas, he has not committed the offences alleged against him.
3.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner also submits that even as bare perusal of the FIR would reveal that the main allegation is against Pramod Sharma and the accused-petitioner has been implicated only on account of being relative of Pramod Sharma.
4.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner further submits that in the instant matter charge-sheet has been filed. He is no
[2025:RJ-JP:23121] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3190/2025] longer required for custodial interrogation, nor anything is to be recovered from him. He is behind the Bars since 09.01.2025. Trial is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, the accused- petitioner may be allowed to enlarge on bail.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considered the submissions made at Bar.
7. In view of above, without making any comment over the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant the bail application.
8. Accordingly, the Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Mamraj Sharma S/o Babulal Sharma shall be released on bail in pursuance of F.I.R. No.77/2024 registered at Police Station Murlipura District Jaipur (West) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court.
9. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise.
(ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J DAKSH/20