Phiti Rai @ Sheshnath Rai @ Fitti Ray @ Fittilal Ray v. The Stae of Bihar
CR. MISC./63399/2025 · 2025-09-23
Sandeep Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96879 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96879 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63399 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-440 Year-2025 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ======================================================
1. Phiti Rai @ Sheshnath Rai @ Fitti Ray @ Fittilal Ray S/O Supan Ray @ Supan Prasad Ray R/O Vill.- Sabalpur Hasti Tola, P.S.- Sonpur, Dist.- Saran (Chapra)
2. Dilip Rai @ Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Ray S/o Mahavir Ray R/O Vill.- Sabalpur Hasti Tola, P.S.- Sonpur, Dist.- Saran (Chapra) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The Stae of Bihar Advocate General Patna High Court Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Indu Kumari Srivastava ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 23-09-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 440 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The recovery is of 372 liters of illicit liquor.
4. The petitioners are in custody since 6.8.2025 and apart from the present case, the petitioner no. 1 has six criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has four criminal antecedent.
5. Considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63399 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 2/2
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U