IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 106 Satish Chander Shekhar Khare, IAS, Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, HSVP, Panchkula, Haryana and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated this Court in CWP Haryana and others” vide which direction was issued to the respondents to comply and make the payment in accordance with the proposed plan/priority list. inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. COCP-4458-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.4458 of 2025 Date of decision : Versus Chander Shekhar Khare, IAS, Chief Administrator, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, HSVP, Panchkula, Haryana and CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Mr. Jayant Puneet Bamal, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate for the respondent(s) NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the ed 14.2.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by a this Court in CWP-20384-2021 titled as “ Haryana and others” vide which direction was issued to the respondents to comply and make the payment in accordance with the ed plan/priority list. After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4458 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-02.09.2025 …..Petitioner Chief Administrator, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, HSVP, Panchkula, Haryana and …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Aditya Jain, Advocate (through VC) Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Jayant Puneet Bamal, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate for the respondent(s)-HSVP. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the interim 1) passed by a Division Bench of titled as “Pradeep Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others” vide which direction was issued to the respondents to comply and make the payment in accordance with the After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.02 19.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document September 0 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-4458-2025 (O & M) Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. September 02, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.02 19.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document