Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9686 (AP)

V. Jyothi Rani v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/6491/2022 · 2025-01-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010107362022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3368] FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6491/2022 Between: 1. V. JYOTHI RANI, , W/O. V.RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC- EMPLOYEE, R/O. D. NO.8-3-110, 3RD LINE, BTR COLONY, MANGALAM, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ALIPIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 5. RANADHEERAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY-CUM- PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, BTR COLONY, TIRUPATHI RURAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 6. TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. V SANTHA KUMARI, W/O. V. SANKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC- EMPLOYEE, R/O. D. NO. 8-3-06, BTR COLONY, MANGALAM, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 4. V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO.6491 OF 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 3rd respondent, at the instance of respondents 5 and 8 in insisting me to vacate me from my house and Vacant site property in Bearing D.No.8-3- 110, in Survey Number 1 of Mangalam Revenue Village in No.8 in Tirupathi Urban Mandal of Chittoor District, without there being any authority of law and insisting me to appear before his authority and to yield and settle to the terms of 8th respondent for payment of money as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with my personal life and liberty and pass…” 2. Sri Muchakayala Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a memo was filed vide USR No.120560 of 2024 sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. 4 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.01.2025 Pmk 5 27 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:6491 of 2022 Date: 03.01.2025 Pmk