Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9685 (AP)

AWARE SOCIETY v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/6572/2020 · 2025-09-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010107582020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6572/2020 Between: 1. AWARE SOCIETY, (ACTION FOR WELFARE AND AWAKENING IN RURAL ENVIRONMENT) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI.K. VENKAT REDDY, S/O.BUCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, HAVING OFFICE AT 5-9-24/78, LAKE HILL ROAD, ADARSHNAGAR, HYDERABAD 500 063, T.S. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., HOME DEPARTMENT,A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 522 503, A.P. 2. THE SUERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT HAVING OFFICE AT ENGLISHPALEM, RESERVE POLICE QUARTERS, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP 521002 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, BANDAR TALUQ P.S., EDEPALLI, SRINIVAS NAGAR COLONY, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT AP 521 001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHAVI LATHA KATASANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a issue Writ or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the 3rd respondent in trying to forcefully and illegally take over the quarters and building of the petitioner society in the name of erecting a police outpost is illegal and against to the principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 not to illegally take o'er the quarters and building of the petitioner society” 2 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 11.09.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.6572 of 2020 Dt.11.09.2025 Asr