121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6108-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 NARINDERPAL SINGH AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus PARAMJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioners. Parmod Goyal, J. (Oral) Petitioner has preferred the present revision petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, invoking power of Superintendence vested in this Court. No order by learned Court of first instance has been challenged by way of present revision petition. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners is taking a plea that learned Court of first instance while framing issue Nos.3, 4 and 5 should have treated them as preliminary issues. Admittedly, no such prayer has been made before the Court of first instance. In absence of any prayer, no ground to interfere in the present case is made out. 3. Petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to move appropriate application in accordance with law before the Court of first instance. CHIRANJEEV SINGH 2025.09.11 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4. The Court of first instance shall decide the said application in accordance with law. (PARMOD GOYAL) 09.09.2025 JUDGE chiranjeev Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No CHIRANJEEV SINGH 2025.09.11 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document