HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32399 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Petitioner before this Court is aggrieved by the order passed by the revenue authority vesting the land in the State. He has moved a representation before the revenue authorities. 2. The prayer made in the writ petition is for directing the revenue authority to decide the revision. 3. From perusal of the representation made by the petitioner, it appears that an order under Section 98 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, has been passed. The petitioner has remedy of filing a revision. No direction can be issued for deciding the representation. 4. The writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. September 17, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Verma, Prabhat Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Chandra Kanti .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad