Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96817 (ALL)

MAHNGU AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/32491/2025 · 2025-09-16

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32491 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel as to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the order impugned is an appealable order under Section 67 (5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 2. In view of the said fact, no writ petition lies under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. Writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. However, it is open to the petitioners to file appeal before the appellate authority within 15 days from today and, in case, the said apepal is filed within the period mentioned above, the appellate authority shall not go into the question of limitation and decide the same strictly in accordance with law. September 17, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arunesh Kumar Singh, Dinesh Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mahngu And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad