HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32495 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.393 of 2025, under Section 137(2), 87, 351(2) BNS and Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Milak, District Rampur, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 17, 2025 Vivek Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ehtesham Afsar Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Priti And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad