Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96814 (ALL)

SMT. SONY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/32416/2025 · 2025-09-16

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32416 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.524 of 2025, under Section 87, 352 BNS, Police Station Nawabganj, District Bareilly, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 17, 2025 Vivek Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Kashyap Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Sony And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad