Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96810 (PNJ)

RAJ KUMARI THROUGH HER LRS AND ANOTHER v. CHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE, IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/4445/2025 · 2025-09-09

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 207-II Raj Kumari (deceased) through LRs and another Chander Shekhar Khare, IAS, Chief Administrator, Haryana Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran, HSVP Office Complex C Panchkula, Haryana and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated of this Court in CWP of Haryana and others” whereby the following direction was issued : COCP-4445-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.4445 Date of decision : Raj Kumari (deceased) through LRs and another Versus Chander Shekhar Khare, IAS, Chief Administrator, Haryana Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran, HSVP Office Complex C Panchkula, Haryana and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate (through VC) Mr. Rakesh Vohra, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Nihar Bala, Advocate with Mr. Aman Chavariya, Advocate for Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2 Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 14.2.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by of this Court in CWP-20384-2021 titled as “ of Haryana and others” whereby the following direction was issued : “xxx xxx xxx Keeping in view of above detailed proposed plan and the interest of the land owners, a direction is being given in this case that all the 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4445 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-09.09.2025 Raj Kumari (deceased) through LRs and another …..Petitioners Chander Shekhar Khare, IAS, Chief Administrator, Haryana Shehari Vikas Pradhikaran, HSVP Office Complex C-3, Sector-6, …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Jain, Advocate (through VC) with Mr. Rakesh Vohra, Advocate Ms. Nihar Bala, Advocate with Mr. Aman Chavariya, Advocate for Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate No.1 and 2-HSVP. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the interim 1) passed by the Division Bench led as “Pradeep Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others” whereby the following direction was issued :- Keeping in view of above detailed proposed plan and the interest of the land owners, a direction is being given in this case that all the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.10 20.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document No.3 by way of affidavit of Collector, Urban Estate, Gurugram has on record. Copy for the petitioner. The Registry is directed to tag the s appropriate place in the file. submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition. withdrawn COCP-4445-2025 (O & M) executing courts in the State of Haryana are restrained from taking any coercive steps as the respondents have carved out plan for depositing the compensation amount and the reference courts will accept the compensation as per the above said proposed plan. Learned counsel for respondent further informs that due publication will be done with respect to proposed plan of depositing compensation in the entire State of Haryana so that land owners can be awared with respect to deposit of compensation as per t above. A direction is being given to the respondents to comply and make the payment in accordance with the above said proposed plan/priority list. xxx xxx xxx” Status report dated 08.09.2025 on behalf of respondent by way of affidavit of Mrs. Anupma Malik, Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Gurugram has been filed. The same on record. Copy thereof is supplied to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The Registry is directed to tag the s appropriate place in the file. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt Permitted to do so. The present contempt petition is withdrawn. Rule stands discharged. 2 uting courts in the State of Haryana are restrained from taking any coercive steps as the respondents have carved out plan for depositing the compensation amount and the reference courts will accept the compensation as per the above said Learned counsel for respondent-HSVP further informs that due publication will be done with respect to proposed plan of depositing compensation in the entire State of Haryana so that land owners can be awared with respect to deposit of compensation as per the schedule stated A direction is being given to the respondents to comply and make the payment in accordance with the above said proposed plan/priority list. 025 on behalf of respondent Mrs. Anupma Malik, Land Acquisition been filed. The same is taken supplied to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The Registry is directed to tag the same at At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt The present contempt petition is dismissed as VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.10 20.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document September 0 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-4445-2025 (O & M) Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 09, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 3 Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.10 20.32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document