PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/10568/2023 · 2025-07-21
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96790 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96790 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
253 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10568-2023 DECIDED ON:21.07.2025
PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER …..PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS …..RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL. Present: Mr. Sirat Sapra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajiv Verma, Senior DAG Punjab ***** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents No.1 to 3, to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also to ensure safety of the person and property of the petitioners, which is under threat at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 7 with further prayer, not to falsely implicate the petitioner No.2 and his family members in a false case at the behest of private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 21.07.2025 JUDGE Sham Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SHAM SUNDER 2025.07.23 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document