BILAL AHMAD BEIGH v. DILSHADA AKA MEENU AKHTER AND ANR.
CRM(M)/748/2023 · 2025-02-28
Sanjay Dhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9677 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9677 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 41 Reg Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 748/2023 CrlM(1716/2023).
BILAL AHMAD BEIGH.
…PETITIONER (s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
DILSHADA AKA MEENU AKHTER AND ANR.
Through: None.
…RESPONDENT(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE.
ORDER 28-02-2025
Perusal of the minutes of proceedings reveals that nobody has been appearing in this case on behalf of the petitioner for two consecutive hearings. Today also when the matter was called out for hearing, none has appeared on his behalf. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute his case.
In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 28-02-2025 Showkat Khan