Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96766 (PNJ)

AARTI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/25801/2025 · 2025-09-01

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No. 138 CWP-25801-2025 Decided on: 01.09.2025 Aarti and others . . . Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA PRESENT: Mr. R. S. Dhull, Advocate and Mr. Navnit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Harpriya Khaneka, Advocate for respondent no.3/Commision. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.(ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus seeking direction to the Commission to re-conduct the Subject Knowledge Test for the post of Physics on the ground that there were certain typing errors in question no.1(a) 15, 10, 6, 4(a) and 14 of the question paper which made it virtually impossible for the candidates to attempt the questions. 2. Learned counsel for respondent no.3/Commission contends that representations have been received by them in this regard, and the Commission is in the process of considering the same. 3. In view thereof, the petition is disposed of with the direction to Secretary of the Commission to treat the present petition as a consolidated representation on behalf of all the petitioners and decide the same by passing a reasoned order at least a week prior to holding of the interviews. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 01.09.2025 JUDGE Mehak Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No MEHAK HURIA 2025.09.03 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment