101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9519-2025 Date of Decision :02.09.2025 Gurmeet Singh and Another …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and Others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh Jattana, Advocate and Mr. Mandeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioners. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a direction to second respondent/Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran to decide the petitioners’ representation dated 01.08.2025, Annexure P-3, wherein it is alleged that the petitioners are being forced to become false witnesses regarding deposit of payment in the account of the accused/fifth respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case second respondent is directed to decide their pending representation, dated 01.08.2025, Annexure P-3, in a specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. S.S. Chahal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State and on instructions, submits that the pending representation, dated 01.08.2025 will be decided and appropriate action PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.09.03 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-9519-2025 -2- will be taken by the second respondent/Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran, in accordance with law within four weeks. 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. Ordered accordingly. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) September 02, 2025 JUDGE ps Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.09.03 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document