( 2025:JHHC:16114 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2637 of 2025 ------ Surya Kumar Lohra @ Surya Lohra, aged about 32 years, son of Shankar Lohra, resident of vill –Shivpuri, P.O. & P.S. – Doranda, Dist –Ranchi. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate ------ Order No.03 Dated- 18.06.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. Case No. 127 of 2025 arising out of Doranda P.S. Case No.270 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 309(6) and 311 of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and caused hurt to the victim. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the informant drawing attention of this Court to Interlocutory Application No. 6157 of 2025 which is supported by separate affidavit of the Pairvikar of the petitioner, victim and the informant that therein it has been categorically mentioned that on the basis of suspicion, the informant lodged the F.I.R. but later on he came to know that the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –13 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.11.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner - XII, Ranchi, in connection with S.T. Case No. 127 of 2025 arising out of Doranda P.S. Case No.270 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/