Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.431 of 2025 1) Krushna Chandra Prusty ..... Petitioners 2) Antaryami Prusty Represented By Adv. - Bishnu Prasad Pradhan -versus- State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – M.R.Patra, A.S.C. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 15.01.2025 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the records. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the Petitioner No.1 has been arrested in the meantime. Therefore, he does not want this application in respect of the petitioner No.1. In such view of the matter, the bail application is being disposed of in respect of the Petitioner No.1 as not pressed. 4. The Petitioner No.2 is apprehending arrest for the alleged commission of offence under Sections 296/126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/ 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S. in G.R. Case No.2442 of 2024 of the Court of the learned J.M.F.C. (O), Bhubaneswar arising out of Balianta P.S. Page 2 of 2. Case No.637 of 2024. 5. On perusal of the record, it appears that all the alleged offences are bailable in nature. 6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid fact, this Court is of the view that there is no apprehension of arrest against the Petitioner No.2. Accordingly, the present bail application is not maintainable. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the ABLAPL is disposed of. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil