RAMESHWAR ALIAS RANJEET S/O DEVISINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3176/2025 · 2025-03-05
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9674 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9674 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9666] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.3176/2025 Rameshwar Alias Ranjeet S/o Devisingh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bapawar Police Station Bhalta District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 05/03/2025
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.46/2025, registered at Police Station Bhalta, District Jhalawar, for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21 and 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the recovery of contraband article containing 24.33 grams of smack was effected from the other co-accused Ramgopal and the other co-accused Ramgopal has named the petitioner and apart from the statement of the other co-accused, there is no substantive evidence available on record showing that the petitioner supplied the said contraband articles to the other co-accused Ramgopal. The petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the investigation, custodial interrogation of the
[2025:RJ-JP:9666] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3176/2025] petitioner is not required and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
5. Apart from the disclosure statement of the other co-accused, there are no substantive evidence available on record, the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not required and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Rameshwar Alias Ranjeet S/o Devisingh, in connection with FIR No.46/2025, registered at Police Station Bhalta, District Jhalawar, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case
[2025:RJ-JP:9666] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3176/2025] so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-32