SUMITRA DEVI v. EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ANOTHER
CWP/25861/2025 · 2025-09-01
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96733 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96733 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-25861
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(134)
Sumitra Devi Employees State Insurance Corporation and another
CORAM:
Present:
KULDEEP TIWARI
1.
the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a the respondent No.1, to release the funds of Rs.15,00,000/ liver transplantation of her husband, at PGIMER, Chandigarh, in pursuance to the representation dated 10.06.2025 (Annexure P respondent No.2.
2.
Company, since Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), under Policy No.2614302264 family members ha which includes her husband, two unmarried daughters, and
3.
continuous deduction contributed to ESIC S
5861-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sumitra Devi
Versus Employees State Insurance Corporation
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Sourav Duvedi, Advocate for Mr. Arjun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a the respondent No.1, to release the funds of Rs.15,00,000/ liver transplantation of her husband, at PGIMER, Chandigarh, in pursuance to the representation dated 10.06.2025 (Annexure P respondent No.2. The petitioner was employed with Company, since 16.11.2021. By virtue of her employment, she is insured with Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), under Policy No.2614302264, with registration dated 27.11.2021, family members have also been mentioned in the ESIC which includes her husband, two unmarried daughters, and
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that t continuous deduction contributed to ESIC S
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-25861-2025 Date of Decision : 01.09.2025
…Petitioner Versus
...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Sourav Duvedi, Advocate for Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the respondent No.1, to release the funds of Rs.15,00,000/- for treatment of liver transplantation of her husband, at PGIMER, Chandigarh, in pursuance to the representation dated 10.06.2025 (Annexure P-9), submitted to the The petitioner was employed with Jawandsons Private Limited of her employment, she is insured with Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), under Policy , with registration dated 27.11.2021, and the details of the also been mentioned in the ESIC e-Pehchan Card, which includes her husband, two unmarried daughters, and one minor son.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is continuous deduction contributed to ESIC Scheme, as per the prescribed terms
Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of , upon treatment of liver transplantation of her husband, at PGIMER, Chandigarh, in pursuance to 9), submitted to the Private Limited of her employment, she is insured with Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), under Policy and the details of the n Card,
here is a as per the prescribed terms MANPREET SINGH 2025.09.02 09:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-25861
and conditions suffering from a serious ailment, which require transplantation Chandigarh. concerned, that he requires liver transplant which is to be incurred, would be Rs.15,00,000/ she has approached the authorities concerned, however, till date, no action has been taken by the respondents
4. counsel for the petitioner, and has also gone through the paper book with his able assistance and the available record. 5. during the course of the arguments, mandamus, upon the competent respondent amongst the respondents, to forthwith, examine the representation take a final decision thereof. 6. the aforesaid exercise shall be done, within a period of ten days, from the date of re certified copy of this order. 7. September 01 Manpreet
5861-2025 and conditions, for the financial year 2024- suffering from a serious ailment, which require ation. The husband of the petitioner was referred to the PGIMER, Chandigarh. On 19.05.2025, during his check concerned, that he requires liver transplantation which is to be incurred, would be Rs.15,00,000/ she has approached the authorities concerned, however, till date, no action has by the respondents, on her representation (supra) This Court has heard the submissions as made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and has also gone through the paper book with his able assistance and the available record. Considering the urgency involved and the innocuous prayer made during the course of the arguments, this Court, deems it apt to pass a , upon the competent respondent amongst the respondents, to forthwith, examine the representation/case take a final decision thereof. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is the aforesaid mandamus. However, it is made clear that the above said exercise shall be done, within a period of ten days, from the date of re certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. September 01, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
2 -2025. The petitioner’s husband is suffering from a serious ailment, which requires immediate liver husband of the petitioner was referred to the PGIMER, , during his check-up, it was opined by the Doctor ation, and the estimated expenditure which is to be incurred, would be Rs.15,00,000/-. The petitioner stated that she has approached the authorities concerned, however, till date, no action has , on her representation (supra).
This Court has heard the submissions as made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and has also gone through the paper book with his urgency involved and the innocuous prayer made this Court, deems it apt to pass a , upon the competent respondent amongst the respondents, to /case of the petitioner, and thereafter, In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with However, it is made clear that the above said exercise shall be done, within a period of ten days, from the date of receipt of
(KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No
The petitioner’s husband is immediate liver husband of the petitioner was referred to the PGIMER, Doctor , and the estimated expenditure . The petitioner stated that she has approached the authorities concerned, however, till date, no action has This Court has heard the submissions as made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and has also gone through the paper book with his urgency involved and the innocuous prayer made this Court, deems it apt to pass a , upon the competent respondent amongst the respondents, to reafter, with However, it is made clear that the above said ceipt of
MANPREET SINGH 2025.09.02 09:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment