Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9673 (UTT)

MAHENDRA KUMARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1290/2025 · 2025-08-06

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 05 WPSS No.1290 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Bisht, Additional C.S.C. for the State. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh representation to the authorities concerned. The petitioner proposes to withdraw the writ petition. He can do so, and he is permitted to do so. Insofar as filing of a fresh representation is concerned, the petitioner is always free to do so, if it is permissible under law. With the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 06.08.2025 RV