APHC010107652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5495/2025 Between: Ggr Housing India Pvt Ltd ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BOPPUDI ALEKHYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in considering the Representations of the Petitioner, dated 26.11.2024 and 24.12.2024 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 to consider the representations of the petitioner, dated 26.11.2024 and 24 12 2024 and to pass such other order or orders...” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of Ac.0.56 cents in Sy.No.180/15 and Ac.0.56 cents in Sy.No.180/16 at Modavalsa village, Vizianagaram, having acquired the subject land through registered sale deeds vide Doc.No.87/2017, 692/2017, and 708/2017, dated 02.01.2017, 25.02.2017 and 25.02.2017 respectively. After conducting a survey, it is found that only Ac.0.15 cents exist in Sy.No.180/15, contrary to the actual extent of Ac.0.56 cents which was recorded in revenue records. This discrepancy, confirmed by SFA and FMB sketches, is due to an error by revenue authorities in issuing the patta. As a result, the petitioner has been deprived of Ac.0.41 cents. For which, the petitioner submitted representations dated 26.11.2024 and 24.12.2024 to the respondent Nos. 2 and 4. However, despite receiving the representations, the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 neither considered them nor took any action. Hence, this writ petition. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if a direction is given to respondent authorities to consider the representation dated 26.11.2024 and 24.12.2024 submitted by the petitioner to the respondent Nos. 2 and 4 in accordance with law. 5. Learned Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents, submits that the petitioner should submit a fresh representation to the concerned respondent authorities. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the respondent authorities will consider the petitioner's case in accordance with the law within a reasonable time. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into merits of the case, this Court is of the considered view that the present Writ Petition can be disposed of by directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the respondents No.2 to 4. Further the respondents No.2 to 4 is directed to consider the said representation and shall pass appropriate orders within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the said representation. 7. With the above said direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ______________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 06.03.2025 kkllkk 178 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.5495 of 2025 06.03.2025 kkllkk